Our research is based on the premise that
policy-makers can and should create the conditions for health and
good health care. In particular we believe that state institutions
have a responsibility to provide the formal and material parameters
for this to happen. We support the realisation of this task in
critical and advisory capacities.
We examine the influence of state and non-state actors and networks
on the state of health of the population, taking particular cases as
examples. We look at the macro level of the state, the meso level of
non-state collective actors and the micro level of individual
actors. We use the data provided by socio- epidemiological studies
and health research studies to draw attention to the implications
and consequences for health of political regulation. We call this
combination of health research and political science health
politology.
We are currently addressing three sets of questions:
• Which conditions further and which inhibit a forward-looking,
sustainable workplace health policy?
• What impact has the reform of the hospital reimbursement system
and the introduction of the diagnosis related group (DRG) system had
on the quality of care in the in-patient sector?
• In what way can the increased significance of primary prevention
in health be regarded as the evolution of a new field of policy?
Our three avenues of research use different combinations of theories
and methods. What they have in common is that they all interface
with political science theories. Thus workplace health policy
constitutes an example of responsive programme development by means
of network governance. What interests us about the impact of the
reform of the hospital reimbursement system in Germany is its link
with changes in the macro-economic structure of the social security
system. With our concept of evolving policy fields we would like to
make a contribution to control theory.