|
|
Thematic Framework
Democratic governance and civil society are central components of
modern societies. They are testimony to the accomplishments of these
societies, but remain an ever-present challenge. The prevailing
consensus among modern societies, in accordance with their
respective constitutional orders, is that democratic governance is
the legitimate and most effective vehicle for political integration
and conflict resolution. This assumes that a sufficient measure of
“civility” is present within society, in terms of social interaction
based on mutually accepted norms, and that such engagement serves
the interests of all.
In Research Area IV, “Civil Society, Conflict and Democracy,” both
of these premises are critically scrutinized. Do they still hold,
however, when we are compelled to take into account new regulatory
problems and conflicts associated with the globalization or
transnationalization of social dynamics? This is the issue and the
new challenge with which we are confronted: Are the assumptions of
democratic governance valid for the newly emerging democracies of
transitional societies and developing countries, whose respective
economic and cultural histories may differ radically from those from
which our developed Western democracies have sprung? Worldwide
economic interdependence, global ecological hazards, and migratory
pressures are problems of a magnitude that call into question the
ability of nation-states to take effective action, and they are
issues that fragment and divide states and national societies. How
does and how must democracy adapt? How important is political
governance buttressed by civil society self-organization? How is
democratic participation achieved? How do specific types of violence
and corresponding forms of control over violence develop?
This range of questions outlines the issues addressed in Research
Area IV. The following summarizes the various topics and
perspectives of current work, and elucidates the convergences and
complementarities between some of the individual research units in
this area.
Governance, democracy, migration, and problems of international
relations are the main areas of focus in Research Area IV. The
spectrum of topics ranges from macro-level institutions of the
polity (constitutions, electoral systems), over the functions of
networks and social movements, to micro-level processes dealing with
concrete procedures and systems of negotiation. Within this range,
thematic overlap creates the possibility for joint undertakings and
cooperation between the research units, research groups, and
research professorships. For example, the newly instituted project
group, “Rule of Law,” is a joint undertaking of the Research
Professorship (FP) “New Forms of Governance” in conjunction with the
research units “Transnational Conflicts and International
Institutions” (TKI) and “Democracy: Structures, Performance,
Challenges (DSL). The TKI research unit and the research group
“Civil Society, Citizenship and Political Mobilization in Europe
(ZCM) share an interest in the important subject of nongovernmental
organizations, whereby the work of each unit supplements that of the
other: TKI’s focus is primarily on policy formulation and
implementation; ZCM deals with political mobilization and agenda
setting. The civil society orientation of business enterprises also
constitutes a common area of interest between these research units.
Various aspects to the “Europeanization” of the public and the
democracy deficit in international governance are investigated and
dealt with complimentarily by the DSL research unit, the ZCM
research group, and FP Governance. The historical dimension of
democratization and constitutional development is also examined and
dealt with by the ZCM research group, in close cooperation with the
Research Professorship “Historical Social Sciences” (HSW). Finally,
the planned documentation center for research on intercultural
conflict and societal integration could well be docked in Research
Area IV: Strong connections and interest already exist vis-à-vis the
units ZCM (which manages the protest data base, “Prodat”) and TKI. |
|